Their Own Words .net

Compare national party platforms,
issue by issue

Public Land
About this Site / Feedback
2004 Republican Party Platform
2004 Democratic Party Platform
2004 Libertarian Party Platform


Public Lands for the Public Good

            Collaborative conservation represents the future for the 657 million acres of America we call the "Public Lands."  Working from the grass roots up, local groups are finding solutions for the problems of the public lands in their areas.  Republicans want to encourage that approach, for it holds the greatest promise of sound environmental stewardship and productive use of the nation's natural resources.  We will change the operating culture of the federal agencies that manage public lands, giving a greater role to states and to their political subdivisions in order to foster a creative partnership with the American people.  As a sign of that partnership, we applaud Governor Bush's intention to make all federal facilities comply with the environmental laws by which the American people live.

            If there had been any doubt that major reform is needed in the management of public lands, it was burnt away in the catastrophic wildfires of recent months.  This avoidable devastation was the price innocent people and helpless communities paid for the extreme policies — and environmental arrogance — of the current administration.  Greater tragedies await the people of our Western States if those policies are not changed.  Republicans will employ the best techniques of forestry science to implement a national management strategy for public lands that minimizes the risk to local communities while preserving our natural heritage. 

            Our national parks are the crown jewels of the country's environmental heritage.   They belong to all Americans and should be accessible to all.  Congressional Republicans have taken the lead in reversing years of neglect and abuse of these treasures, and we will continue that proactive agenda to keep the park system healthy and accessible to all.  We should make it a priority to alleviate the maintenance and operations backlog at our national parks.  Rather than adding to this magnificent legacy by unilateral executive branch action, such as the administration's recent National Monument designations, we will seek to actively involve Congress, as well as affected states and local communities, in land acquisition decisions.

            We support multiple use of public lands conducted in an environmentally and economically sustainable manner.  We are committed to preserving high priority wilderness and wetlands.  The Everglades are a crucial example of a special federal responsibility.  We call for a review of lands owned by the national government — half the total territory of our Western States — to develop a comprehensive plan to better manage existing holdings.  In some cases, that may mean transferring or sharing responsibility for managing those lands with state or local governments, while all levels of government should recognize existing rights to water, minerals, and grazing.  We reaffirm the traditional state primacy over water allocations and will continue the availability of renewable rangeland under conditions that ensure both expanded production of livestock and protection of the range environment.  We also reaffirm our commitment to preserve access to public lands for multiple use.

            We recognize the vital role the timber industry plays in our economy, particularly in homebuilding, and we support its efforts to improve the health of the country's forests.  Because so many people in rural America rely on public forests for their livelihood, a Republican administration will promote sustainable forest management, using the best science in place of the no-growth policies that have devastated communities in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska.

  

Protecting public lands. We will use our natural resources to fuel our economy, but end Republican giveaways to special interests that exploit public lands without regard for environmental consequences. We will require companies to restore leased lands to their original state after their work is done. And we will make sure our government treats our national parks with the same respect and care that millions of families show each year when they visit.

Honoring our hunting and fishing heritage. We are committed to protecting the lands used by hunters and anglers, and we will open millions of new acres of land to public hunting and fishing. We will conserve and restore the habitats where wildlife flourish, expanding use of voluntary, incentive-based programs that target private landowners.

Resource Use

The Issue: We oppose government control of resource use through eminent domain, zoning laws, building codes, rent control, regional planning, urban renewal, or purchase of development rights with tax money. Such regulations and programs violate property rights, discriminate against minorities, create housing shortages, and tend to cause higher rents. All government restrictions upon private use or voluntary transfer of water rights or similar despotic controls can only aggravate the misallocation of water. Forced surface-mining of privately homesteaded lands, in which the government has reserved surface mining rights for itself, is a violation of the rights of the present landholders.

The Principle: Resource management is properly the responsibility and right of the legitimate owners of land, water and other natural resources. We recognize the legitimacy of resource planning by means of private, voluntary covenants.

Solutions: We advocate the establishment of an efficient and just system of private water rights applied to all bodies of water, surface and underground. Such a system should be built upon a doctrine of first claim and use. The allocation of water should be governed by unrestricted competition and unregulated prices. We also advocate the privatization of government and quasi-government water supply systems. Only the complete separation of water and the State will prevent future water crises. We call for the homesteading or other just transfer to private ownership of federally held lands.

Transitional Action: The construction of government dams and other water projects should cease, and existing government water projects should be transferred to private ownership. We favor the abolition of the Bureau of Reclamation and the Army Corps of Engineers' civilian functions. We also favor the abolition of all local water districts and their power to tax. We oppose any use of executive orders invoking the Antiquities Act to set aside public lands. We call for the abolition of the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service. We oppose creation of new government parks or wilderness and recreation areas. Such parks and areas that already exist should be transferred to non-government ownership. Pending such just transfer, their operating costs should be borne by their users rather than by taxpayers.

Related Sites:

American Presidency
Project
Archive of Platforms, 1840-2004 (only parties receiving electoral votes)

Abortion / Agriculture / Children / Communication / Crime / Discrimination / Drug Control / Education / Election Laws / Energy / Environment / Foreign Policy / Gay Marriage / Government Debt / Gun Control / Health Care / Immigration / International Assistance / Medical Regulation / Native Americans / Preamble / Public Land / Religion / Social Security / Student Loans / Taxation / Trade Agreements / Transportation / U.S. Territories / Unions / United Nations / Weapons of Mass Destruction / Welfare

About this Site / Feedback